Запис Детальніше

A multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of roads and streets system in Gniezno

DSpace at Ternopil State Ivan Puluj Technical University

Переглянути архів Інформація
 
 
Поле Співвідношення
 
Title A multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of roads and streets system in Gniezno
 
Creator Kicinski, Marcin
Bienczak, Maciej
Fierek, Szymon
Merkisz-Guranowska, Agnieszka
Zmuda-Trzebiatowski, Pawel
 
Contributor Poznan University of Technology – Division of Transport Systems, Piotrowo str. 3, 60-965, Poznan, Poland; marcin.kicinski@put.poznan.pl
Poznan University of Technology – Division of Transport Systems, Piotrowo str. 3, 60-965, Poznan, Poland; maciej.bienczak@put.poznan.pl
Poznan University of Technology – Division of Transport Systems, Piotrowo str. 3, 60-965, Poznan, Poland; szymon.fierek@put.poznan.pl
Poznan University of Technology – Division of Transport Systems, Piotrowo str. 3, 60-965, Poznan, Poland; agnieszka.merkisz-guranowska@put.poznan.pl
Poznan University of Technology – Division of Transport Systems, Piotrowo str. 3, 60-965, Poznan, Poland; pawel.zmuda-trzebiatowski@put.poznan.pl
 
Date 2019-07-09T06:30:54Z
2019-07-09T06:30:54Z
2019-05-28
2019-05-28
 
Type Conference Abstract
 
Identifier A multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of roads and streets system in Gniezno / Marcin Kicinski, Maciej Bienczak, Szymon Fierek, Agnieszka Merkisz-Guranowska, Pawel Zmuda-Trzebiatowski // Proceedings of ICCPT 2019, May 28-29, 2019. — Tern. : TNTU, Scientific Publishing House “SciView”, 2019. — P. 22–31.
978-966-305-101-7
http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/handle/lib/28726
Kicinski M., Bienczak M., Fierek S., Merkisz-Guranowska A., Zmuda-Trzebiatowski P. (2019) A multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of roads and streets system in Gniezno. Proceedings of ICCPT 2019 (Tern., May 28-29, 2019), pp. 22-31.
 
Language en
 
Relation Матеріали Міжнародної науково-технічної конференції „Актуальні проблеми транспорту“, 2019
Proceedings of the 1-st International Scientific Conference "Current Problems of Transport", 2019
https://bdl.stat.gov.pl
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(93)90056-O
http://www.promethee-gaia.net
1. Bouyssou, D.; Jacquet-Lagrèze, E.; Perny, P.; Słowiński, R.; Vanderpooten, D.; Vincke, P. (eds.). Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: essays in honor of Bernard Roy. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science 44. Springer Science+ Business Media, 2002, 558 p. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0843-4
2. Brans J.P.; Vincke, P.; Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects: The Promotehee method. European Journal of Operational Research 1986, 24(2), 228-238. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
3. Brans, J.P.; De Smet, Y. PROMETHEE Methods. In: Greco S., Ehrgott M., Rui J. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. State of the Art Surveys (2nd ed.), New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 2016, 187–219. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4
4. Ivanović, I.; Grujičić, D.; Macura, D.; Jović, J.; Bojović, N. One approach for road transport project selection. Transport Policy 2013, 25, 22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.10.001
5. Jacyna, M.; Wasiak, M. The multiple evaluation method of infrastructure investment in railway transport system. Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej – Transport 2017, 63, 119-124 (in polish).
6. Kicinski, M.; Bienczak, M.; Fierek, S. The case of using the multicriteria decision method to evaluate of the road system in Gniezno. Autobusy. Technika, Eksploatacja, Systemy Transportowe 2018(а), 12, 1078–1084. doi:10.24136/atest.2018.554 (in polish).
7. Kicinski, M.; Bieńczak, M.; Fierek, S.; Bałaga, E.; Mądry, M. Analysis and evaluation of solutions regarding the change of the road system aimed to improve the transport of residents in connection with the obstructions at crossings in the area of Mnichowska, Cienista and Gajowa Streets in Gniezno – final report) Hipolit Cegielski State College of Higher Education in Gniezno/Poznan University of Technology, Gniezno/Poznan, 2018(b) (in polish, unpublished material).
8. Local Data Bank [online cit.: 2019-03-10]. Available from: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl
9. Mardani, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Khalifah, Z.; Jusoh, A.; Md Nor, K. Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Transport 2016, 31(3), 359–385. doi:10.3846/16484142.2015.1121517
10. Mareschal, B.; Brans, J.P.; Vincke, P. Promethee: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. Operational Research, 1984, 3, 477–490.
11. Nosal, K.; Solecka, K. Application of AHP method for multi-criteria evaluation of variants of the integration of urban public transport. Transportation Research Procedia 2014, 3, 269–278. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.006.
12. Roy, B. Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Springer, 1996, 293 p. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1
13. Salling, K.; Leleur, S.; Jensen, A. Modelling decision support and uncertainty for large transport infrastructure projects: The CLG-DSS model of the Øresund Fixed Link. Decision Support Systems, 2007, 43, 1539-1547. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.06.009
14. Shakir, M.; Khurshid, M.; Iqbal, J.; Adeel, M. Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) for evaluation of different transportation alternatives: A case of Rawalpindi bypass Pakistan. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics 2018, 3(3), 38–54. doi:10.14254/jsdtl.2018.3-3.3
15. Shi, J.; Zhou, N. A quantitative transportation project investment evaluation approach with both equity and efficiency aspects. Research in Transportation Economics, 2012, 36, 93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.03.002
16. Shi, Y.; Wang, S.; Kou, G.; Wallenius, J. (eds.). New State of MCDM in the 21st Century: Selected Papers of the 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2009. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, 213 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9
17. Shiau, T. Evaluating transport infrastructure decisions under uncertainty. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2014, 6(36), 525-538. doi:10.1080/03081060.2014.921405
18. Sinha, K.C.; Labi, S. Transportation decision making: principles of project evaluation and programming. Wiley, 2007, 567 p. doi: 10.1002/9780470168073
19. Solecka, K. Comparison of Promethee II and AHP methods on example of evaluation of variants of urban public transport system integration. Logistyka 2015, 3, 4521-4532 (in Polish).
20. Tanczos, K. Multicriteria evaluation methods and group decision systems for transport infrastructure development projects. In: Labbé M., Laporte G., Tanczos K., Toint P. (eds) Operations Research and Decision Aid Methodologies in Traffic and Transportation Management. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences), 166. Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998, 164-182. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03514-6_7
21. Vincke, P. Multicriteria decision – AID, Chichester: John Wiley, 1992, 154 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(93)90056-O
22. Visual Promethee [online cit.: 2019-04-10]. Available from: http://www.promethee-gaia.net
23. Zmuda-Trzebiatowski, P. Participatory urban transport projects appraisal. Poznan: Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, 2016, 177 p. (in Polish).
24. Zmuda-Trzebiatowski, P.; Bienczak, M.; Kicinski, M.; Fierek, S.; Zak, J. Multiple criteria evaluation of variants of rebuilding roundabout – case study: modernisation of the Rondo Rataje in Poznan. Technika Transportu Szynowego, 2012, 9, 4585–4594 (in Polish).
 
Rights © Scientific Publishing House “SciView”, 2019
© Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, 2019
 
Format 22-31
10
 
Coverage 28-29 травня 2019 року
May 28-29, 2019
Тернопіль
Ternopil
 
Publisher Scientific Publishing House “SciView”
TNTU