On the criteria of distinction between labour contract and contract of service
Наукові журнали НАУ
Переглянути архів Інформація| Поле | Співвідношення | |
| Title |
On the criteria of distinction between labour contract and contract of service
До питання про критерії розмежування трудового договору та договору про надання послуг |
|
| Creator |
Вишновецька, Світлана
|
|
| Subject |
labour contract, contract of service, the criterion of supervision (control), the criterion of subordination, organizational (integration) criterion
— трудовий договір, договір про надання послуг, критерій управління (контролю), критерій підпорядкованості, організаційний (інтеграційний) критерій УДК 349.22 |
|
| Description |
In the article an author analyzes the criteria of distinction between labour contract and contract of service that are important to determine the legal nature of relationship between the parties. The expediency of using the complex of criteria for effective regulation of labour relations is grounded in the article. English abstract S. Vyshnovetska On the criteria of distinction between labour contract and contract of service In the article an author analyzes the criteria of distinction between labour contract and contract of service which are important to determine the legal nature of relations between the parties. In particular, the author researches a criterion of on-going or one-time nature of the relations between the parties involved, which is often used in legal literature to distinguish labour and civil legal relations. Also the author notes that under the labour contract the employee makes some type of work within the limits of specific work functions in the general production process specified in the labour contract. Under the contract of service the executer makes a concrete task. Achieving the specific results, execution of a concrete task within the limits of particular work function is not the ground for termination of labour relations. As a rule, labour relations tend to continue after the execution of a task, since the employee has certain work functions. So, every new task in labour relations should not be determined by a special contract. The criterion of subordination also recognized by the ILO is thoroughly researched. Based on the analysis the author concludes that the employee, under the control and supervision of the employer, executes certain work functions determined by the labour contract. Therefore, it is the criterion of supervision (control). At the same time, nowadays it is often takes place when the employer has no objective possibility to control the work process because of its territorial indefiniteness and nature of the employee’s work function. It means that the work on the territory or facility is not under a direct or indirect control of the employer. Therefore, this criterion is not effective by itself. The author substantiates the suitability of using a complex of criteria for effective regulation of labour relations. So, the labour contract describes the execution of labour function in the interests, under the control and supervision of the employer with the employee’s integration in the organizational structure of the company.
У статті аналізуються критерії розмежування трудового договору і договору про надання послуг, які є важливими для визначення правової природи відносин між сторонами. Обгрунтовується доцільність використання сукупності критеріїв для ефективного регулювання трудових відносин. |
|
| Publisher |
Національний Авиаційний Університет
|
|
| Contributor |
—
— |
|
| Date |
2016-01-21
|
|
| Type |
—
— — |
|
| Format |
application/pdf
|
|
| Identifier |
http://jrnl.nau.edu.ua/index.php/UV/article/view/9646
|
|
| Source |
Наукові праці Національного авіаційного університету. Серія: Юридичний вісник «Повітряне і космічне право»; Том 3, № 36 (2015); 90-94
Scientific works of National Aviation University. Series: Law Journal "Air and Space Law"; Том 3, № 36 (2015); 90-94 Научные труды Национального авиационного университета. Серия: Юридический вестник "Воздушное и космическое право»; Том 3, № 36 (2015); 90-94 |
|
| Language |
uk
|
|