Запис Детальніше

Breaking organizational routines as a requirement for knowledge broker’s leadership role

Електронний науковий архів Науково-технічної бібліотеки Національного університету "Львівська політехніка"

Переглянути архів Інформація
 
 
Поле Співвідношення
 
Title Breaking organizational routines as a requirement for knowledge broker’s leadership role
 
Creator Janiszewski, Adam
 
Contributor University of Economics in Katowice, POLAND, Katowice
 
Subject knowledge brokers
types of learning
leadership
 
Description In the paper based on conclusions stemming from
literature connected with organizational knowledge creation,
territorial innovation models as well as knowledge
intermediaries author tries to build hypothesis relating to the
possibility of changing ways of both performing tasks and
achieving goals. It is proposed that such kind of opportunity is
related to the nature of the projects under realization reflected
by the type of learning that occurs
 
Date 2018-04-12T13:05:26Z
2018-04-12T13:05:26Z
2017-12-23
2017-12-23
 
Type Conference Abstract
 
Identifier Janiszewski A. Breaking organizational routines as a requirement for knowledge broker’s leadership role / Adam Janiszewski // Litteris et Artibus : proceedings, 23–25 November, 2017. — Lviv : Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House, 2017. — P. 314–316. — (6th International academic conference «Economics & management 2017» (EM-2017)).
978-966-941-108-2
http://ena.lp.edu.ua:8080/handle/ntb/40400
Janiszewski A. Breaking organizational routines as a requirement for knowledge broker’s leadership role / Adam Janiszewski // Litteris et Artibus : proceedings, 23–25 November, 2017. — Lviv : Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House, 2017. — P. 314–316. — (6th International academic conference «Economics & management 2017» (EM-2017)).
 
Language en
 
Relation Litteris et Artibus : матеріали, 2017
Litteris et Artibus : proceedings, 2017
[1] A. K. Gupta, K. G. Smith, Ch. E. Shalley (2006), “The interplay between exploration and exploitation”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 693 – 706.
[2] G. Hamel, C. K. Prahalad (1994), Competing for the Future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
[3] A. Hargadon, A. Fanelli (2002), “Action and possibility: Reconciling dual perspectives of knowledge in organizations”, Organization Science, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 290-302.
[4] J. Hermans, Knowledge transfer in or through clusters: outline of a situated approach [in:] Cooperation, clusters and knowledge transfer: universities and firms towards regional competitiveness. João J. M. Ferreira et al., eds. Heidelberg: Berlin, 2013.
[5] G. von Krogh, I. Nonaka, L. Rechsteiner, „Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: a review and framework”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 240-277.
[6] C. Lawson, E. Lorenz (1999), “Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity”, Regional Studies, vol. 33.4, pp. 305-317.
[7] P. Lopez-Saez, J. E. Navas-Lopez, G. Martin-de- Castro, J. Cruz-Gonzalez (2010), “External knowledge acquisition processes in knowledgeintensive clusters”, Journal of Management, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 690 – 707.
[8] W. Ławniczak, Innowacja w oparciu o potrzeby człowieka. Inspiracje w kontekście RIS w województwie śląskim, The Silesian Innovation Forum, Katowice, 22 June 2017.
[9] P. Maskell, M. Lorenzen (2004), “The cluster as market organization”, Urban Studies, vol. 41, p. 975-993.
[10] K. J. Mason, S. Leek (2008), Learning to Build a Supply Network: An Exploration of Dynamic Business Models, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 774-799.
[11] I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi (2000), Kreowanie wiedzy w organizacji, Poltext, Warszawa.
[12] I. Nonaka, M. Kodama, A. Hirose, F. Kohlbacher (2014), „Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – a new paradigm for organizational theory”, European Management Journal, vol. 32, pp. 137-146.
[13] I. Nonaka, R. Toyama, “The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 419-436.
[14] Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2015, EC, Brussels 2015.
[15] B. Płonka, Przemysł lotniczy i kosmiczny – wyzwania, The Silesian Innovation Forum, Katowice, 22 VI 2017.
[16] Z. J. Zhao, J. Anand (2013), “Beyond boundary spanners: the "collective broker" as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 34, pp. 1513-1530.
[17] ris.slaskie.pl.
[1] A. K. Gupta, K. G. Smith, Ch. E. Shalley (2006), "The interplay between exploration and exploitation", Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 693 – 706.
[2] G. Hamel, C. K. Prahalad (1994), Competing for the Future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
[3] A. Hargadon, A. Fanelli (2002), "Action and possibility: Reconciling dual perspectives of knowledge in organizations", Organization Science, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 290-302.
[4] J. Hermans, Knowledge transfer in or through clusters: outline of a situated approach [in:] Cooperation, clusters and knowledge transfer: universities and firms towards regional competitiveness. João J. M. Ferreira et al., eds. Heidelberg: Berlin, 2013.
[5] G. von Krogh, I. Nonaka, L. Rechsteiner, "Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: a review and framework", Journal of Management Studies, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 240-277.
[6] C. Lawson, E. Lorenz (1999), "Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity", Regional Studies, vol. 33.4, pp. 305-317.
[7] P. Lopez-Saez, J. E. Navas-Lopez, G. Martin-de- Castro, J. Cruz-Gonzalez (2010), "External knowledge acquisition processes in knowledgeintensive clusters", Journal of Management, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 690 – 707.
[8] W. Ławniczak, Innowacja w oparciu o potrzeby człowieka. Inspiracje w kontekście RIS w województwie śląskim, The Silesian Innovation Forum, Katowice, 22 June 2017.
[9] P. Maskell, M. Lorenzen (2004), "The cluster as market organization", Urban Studies, vol. 41, p. 975-993.
[10] K. J. Mason, S. Leek (2008), Learning to Build a Supply Network: An Exploration of Dynamic Business Models, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 774-799.
[11] I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi (2000), Kreowanie wiedzy w organizacji, Poltext, Warszawa.
[12] I. Nonaka, M. Kodama, A. Hirose, F. Kohlbacher (2014), "Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – a new paradigm for organizational theory", European Management Journal, vol. 32, pp. 137-146.
[13] I. Nonaka, R. Toyama, "The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis", Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 419-436.
[14] Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2015, EC, Brussels 2015.
[15] B. Płonka, Przemysł lotniczy i kosmiczny – wyzwania, The Silesian Innovation Forum, Katowice, 22 VI 2017.
[16] Z. J. Zhao, J. Anand (2013), "Beyond boundary spanners: the "collective broker" as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 34, pp. 1513-1530.
[17] ris.slaskie.pl.
 
Rights © Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2017
 
Format 314-316
3
application/pdf
image/png
 
Coverage 23–25 листопада 2017 року
23–25 November, 2017
Львів
Lviv
 
Publisher Видавництво Львівської політехніки
Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House