Rationality in decision-making within interorganisational networks
Електронний науковий архів Науково-технічної бібліотеки Національного університету "Львівська політехніка"
Переглянути архів Інформація| Поле | Співвідношення | |
| Title |
Rationality in decision-making within interorganisational networks
|
|
| Creator |
Danylovych-Kropyvnytska, M.
Limański, A. |
|
| Contributor |
Lviv Polytechnic National University
University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland) |
|
| Subject |
inter-organisational networks
rationality decision-making procedures strategic balance cooperative game coalition 65.012.123 |
|
| Description |
A networking structure is a natural phase in the evolution of organisational forms. An organisational form of a network is a set of interconnected structures and technological elements, i.e. individual economic agents, cultural and social values that arrange inter-organisational relations in a certain order and make network processes operate in a systemlike fashion. Effective joint work in inter-organisational networks suggests a need for a common goal, which is perceived to be a critical factor for joint activities. The paper studies the rationality of decisionmaking for inter-organisational networks. The analysis of behaviour within inter-organisational networks that consist of agents, like firms, entrepreneurs, governmental authorities, scientific centres, proves that group decisions are not always an optimal method to achieve a goal. There are certain tasks and circumstances when an authoritarian approach to problem solving is more sensible. It analyses a formalized model for joint choice, prevailing practice and rationality of group decisionmaking in order to reach a strategic balance within a network. The study summarizes key advantages and drawbacks in case a decision is made by a group. |
|
| Date |
2018-05-31T08:20:35Z
2018-05-31T08:20:35Z 2017 2017 |
|
| Type |
Article
|
|
| Identifier |
Danylovych-Kropyvnytska M. Rationality in decision-making within interorganisational networks / M. Danylovych-Kropyvnytska, A. Limański // Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2017. — Vol 4. — No 2. — P. 9–14.
2312-3435 http://ena.lp.edu.ua:8080/handle/ntb/41304 Danylovych-Kropyvnytska M. Rationality in decision-making within interorganisational networks / M. Danylovych-Kropyvnytska, A. Limański // Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2017. — Vol 4. — No 2. — P. 9–14. |
|
| Language |
en
|
|
| Relation |
Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management, 2 (4), 2017
1. Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L (1998). Small groups. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., Vol. 2, P. 415–469. 2. Bornstein, G. & Yaniv, I. (1998). Individual and group behaviour in the ultimatum games: are groups more “rational” players. Experimental Economics, Vol. 1, P. 101–108. 3. Cox, J. C. (2002). Trust, reciprocity and otherregarding preferences: groups vs. individuals and males vs. females. Avoidances in Experimental Business Research, Vol. 108, P. 331–350. 4. Blinder, A. S. & Morgan, J. (2005). Are two heads better than one? An experimental analysis of group vs. individual decision making. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 7, P. 183–191. 5. Cason, T. N. & Mui, V.-L. (1997). A laboratory study of group polarisation in the team dictator game. Economic Journal, Vol. 107, P. 1465–1483. 6. Kozeletsky, Iu. (1979). Psychological theory of decisions. Moscow: Progress. 7. Diev, V. S. Joint decisions: pros & cons. Retrieved from www.philosophy.nsc.ru. 1. Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L (1998). Small groups. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., Vol. 2, P. 415–469. 2. Bornstein, G. & Yaniv, I. (1998). Individual and group behaviour in the ultimatum games: are groups more "rational" players. Experimental Economics, Vol. 1, P. 101–108. 3. Cox, J. C. (2002). Trust, reciprocity and otherregarding preferences: groups vs. individuals and males vs. females. Avoidances in Experimental Business Research, Vol. 108, P. 331–350. 4. Blinder, A. S. & Morgan, J. (2005). Are two heads better than one? An experimental analysis of group vs. individual decision making. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 7, P. 183–191. 5. Cason, T. N. & Mui, V.-L. (1997). A laboratory study of group polarisation in the team dictator game. Economic Journal, Vol. 107, P. 1465–1483. 6. Kozeletsky, Iu. (1979). Psychological theory of decisions. Moscow: Progress. 7. Diev, V. S. Joint decisions: pros & cons. Retrieved from www.philosophy.nsc.ru. |
|
| Rights |
© Національний університет "Львівська політехніка", 2017
|
|
| Format |
9-14
6 application/pdf image/png |
|
| Coverage |
Lviv
|
|
| Publisher |
Lviv Politechnic Publishing House
|
|