Possibilities of using bus rapid transit in cities with dense construction area
DSpace at Ternopil State Ivan Puluj Technical University
Переглянути архів Інформація| Поле | Співвідношення | |
| Title |
Possibilities of using bus rapid transit in cities with dense construction area
|
|
| Creator |
Royko, Yurii
Bura, Romana Rogalskyy, Roman |
|
| Contributor |
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Stepana Bandery St., 12, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine; jurij.rojko@gmail.com
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Stepana Bandery St., 12, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine; romana_bura@ukr.net Lviv Polytechnic National University, Stepana Bandery St., 12, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine; roboro@ukr.net |
|
| Date |
2019-07-09T06:30:46Z
2019-07-09T06:30:46Z 2019-05-28 2019-05-28 |
|
| Type |
Conference Abstract
|
|
| Identifier |
Royko Y. Possibilities of using bus rapid transit in cities with dense construction area / Yurii Royko, Romana Bura, Roman Rogalskyy // Proceedings of ICCPT 2019, May 28-29, 2019. — Tern. : TNTU, Scientific Publishing House “SciView”, 2019. — P. 84–91.
978-966-305-101-7 http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/handle/lib/28696 Royko Y., Bura R., Rogalskyy R. (2019) Possibilities of using bus rapid transit in cities with dense construction area. Proceedings of ICCPT 2019 (Tern., May 28-29, 2019), pp. 84-91. |
|
| Language |
en
|
|
| Relation |
Матеріали Міжнародної науково-технічної конференції „Актуальні проблеми транспорту“, 2019
Proceedings of the 1-st International Scientific Conference "Current Problems of Transport", 2019 https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818110001 https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1301594 https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015616573 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.018 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000506 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/855/1/012051 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0151-x https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030803 https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2018.1433056 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.288 https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1004556 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-013-0113-1 https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6157 http://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.5.2.2 https://doi.org/10.17226/13614 https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.2495/UT040041 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.06.001 https://doi.org/10.3141/1731-04 1. Alvinsyah, Hadian, A. A demand and capacity analysis on bus semirapid transit network (Case: Jabodetabek public transport network). MATEC Web of Conferences 2018, 181. art. no. 10001, 11. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818110001 2. Ingvardson, J.B.; Nielsen, O.A. Effects of new bus and rail rapid transit systems – an international review. Transport Reviews 2018, 38(1); 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1301594 3. Di, D.; Dongyuan, Y. Dynamic traffic analysis model of multiple passengers for urban public transport corridor. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2015, 7(11); 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015616573 4. Vergel-Tovar, C.E.; Rodriguez, D.A. The ridership performance of the built environment for BRT systems: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Transport Geography 2018, 73, 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.018 5. Ko, J.; Kim, D.; Etezady, A. Determinants of bus rapid transit ridership: System-Level Analysis. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 2019, 145(2). art. no. 04019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000506 6. Susilawati, M.; Nilakusmawati, D.P.E. Study on the factors affecting the quality of public bus transportation service in Bali Province using factor analysis. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 2017, 855. art. no. 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/855/1/012051. 7. Ingvardson, J.B.; Kornerup Jensen, J.; Nielsen, O.A. Analysing improvements to on-street public transport systems: a mesoscopic model approach. Public Transport 2017, 9(1-2); 385-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0151-x 8. Corazza, M.V.; Favaretto, N.A Methodology to Evaluate Accessibility to Bus Stops as a Contribution to Improve Sustainability in Urban Mobility. Sustainability 2019, 11(3); art. no. 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030803 9. Calvo, E.; Ferrer, M. Evaluating the quality of the service offered by a bus rapid transit system: the case of Transmetro BRT system in Barranquilla. Colombia International Journal of Urban Sciences 2018, 22(3); 392-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2018.1433056 10. Chepuri, A.; Raju, N.; Bains, M.S.; Arkatkar, S.; Joshi, G. Examining performance of an urban corridor using microscopic traffic simulation model under mixed traffic environment in India European Transport. Trasporti Europei 2018; 69. (Paper n°2). 11. Chen, Y.; Chen, G.; Wu, K. Evaluation of Performance of Bus Lanes on Urban Expressway Using Paramics Micro-Simulation Model. Procedia Engineering: 2016, 137, 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.288 12. Yang, M.; Sun, G.; Wang, W.; Sun, X.; Ding, J.; Han, J. Evaluation of the pre-detective signal priority for bus rapid transit: coordinating the primary and secondary intersections. Transport 2018, 33(1); 41–51. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1004556 13. Alguliyev, R.; Abdulaev, R. Research of factors influencing efficiency indicators of city transport. Transport problems 2009, 4(2); 93-99. 14. Maeso-González, E; Pérez-Cerón, P. State of art of bus rapid transit transportation. European Transport Research Review 2014, 6(2); 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-013-0113-1 15. Bruun, E.; Allen, D.; Givoni, M. Choosing the right public transport solution based on performance of components. Transport 2018, 33(4); 1017-1029. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6157 16. Cervero, R. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): An efficient and competitive mode of public transport. Working Paper 2013 (01), University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development (IURD). Berkeley: CA; 2013. 17. Jarzab, J.T., et al. Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit Projects: An Overview. Journal of Public Transportation 2002, 5(2); 31-46. http://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.5.2.2 18. American Public Transportation Association. Designing Bus Rapid Transit Running Ways. Washington, DC 2010. 19. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Bus and Rail Transit Preferential Treatments in Mixed Traffic. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press 2010. https://doi.org/10.17226/13614. 20. Currie, G.; Sarvi, M.; Young, W. A new methodology for allocating road space for public transport priority. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, Urban Transport X 2004, 75; 14. https://doi.org/ 10.2495/UT040371 21. Basbas, S. Evaluation of bus lanes in central urban areas through the use of modeling techniques. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, Urban Transport X 2004, 75; 10. https://doi.org/10.2495/UT040041 22. Litman, T. When Are Bus Lanes Warranted? Considering Economic Efficiency, Social Equity and Strategic Planning Goals. Victoria Transport Policy, 2015. 23. Li Zhou; Yizhe Wang; Yangdong Liu. Active signal priority control method for bus rapid transit based on Vehicle Infrastructure Integration International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 2017, 6(2); 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.06.001 24. Furth, P.G.; Muller, T.H.J. Conditional bus priority at signalized intersections: Better service with less traffic disruption. Transportation Research Record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2000, 1731; 23–30. https://doi.org/10.3141/1731-04. |
|
| Rights |
© Scientific Publishing House “SciView”, 2019
© Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, 2019 |
|
| Format |
84-91
8 |
|
| Coverage |
28-29 травня 2019 року
May 28-29, 2019 Тернопіль Ternopil |
|
| Publisher |
Scientific Publishing House “SciView”
TNTU |
|